| Overview | | | | into the wet hair, leave in the hair for two or |
| When we write User Documents we rely on our | | | | three minutes, then rinse it out. |
| Reader's/User's experience to simplify our work. | | | | The problem arises with the combined product. |
| This can cause problems for the Reader. This | | | | Should the User leave the product in the hair for |
| article will discuss the effects of Reader | | | | two or three minutes (as done with the |
| experience and how to minimize the negative | | | | conditioner), or rinse it immediately (as done with |
| effects of incompatible experience, and how to | | | | the shampoo)? |
| handle the writer's assumptions about the Reader. | | | | The User Document (product label) for a |
| Writer's Benefits: Relying on Reader Experience | | | | combined shampoo-conditioner should tell the User |
| When we write, we rely on our Reader's | | | | how to use the two-in-one product. Most such |
| experience to give us a "starting point" for our | | | | labels do not. |
| User Document. Often we make hidden | | | | Example: Words Used in Unexpected Ways |
| assumptions about our Reader's experience. | | | | Your writing can set the expectations of the |
| Here are some examples where relying on our | | | | Reader, resulting in confusion when words are |
| Reader's experience makes things easy (and | | | | used unexpectedly. |
| causes problems) for us as writers: | | | | An article in the Technology Section (of a |
| Example: Using a Computer's Mouse | | | | newspaper on June 10, 2004, page B14) |
| In writing User Documentation for Graphical User | | | | described, "How the little guy can back up |
| Interface-based computer products (such as the | | | | computer data". The article was about computers. |
| Windows or Mac User interface), we assume that | | | | When I came to the sentence: "Let's face it: |
| the the Reader knows how to use a mouse to | | | | backups are boring and a hassle to boot." I |
| click on items, drag, etc. This saves much | | | | wondered about the phrase "to boot." |
| background writing. | | | | In computer jargon, "boot" is the process where |
| Example: Cooking: How to Measure Ingredients; | | | | the computer starts up ("lifts itself by its |
| Terms | | | | bootstraps"...by a program originally called a |
| Cook books save space by (usually correctly) | | | | "bootstrap loader"). Does the author's quote about |
| assuming that a Reader can perform basic | | | | "hassle to boot" mean that if I do backups, then |
| cooking operations (such as measuring | | | | my computer will be slower ("boring") and require |
| ingredients), and terms (such as puree or slice). | | | | more work from me to start up ("hassle to |
| Example: Common Acronyms | | | | boot")? |
| We rely on "common" acronyms such as AM and | | | | The use of the phrase "to boot" is inappropriate in |
| PM to simplify our writing lives. However, many | | | | this article, given that "to boot" has multiple |
| Readers use a 24 hour clock, and thus AM and | | | | meanings. The author used it as slang for "in |
| PM are meaningless to them. | | | | addition to." Since the article was about |
| Beware of any acronyms that you assume that | | | | computers, I thought of the computer meaning of |
| your Reader knows. It is best to define acronyms | | | | "to boot." The sentence would be less confusing if |
| in line (perhaps in parentheses) when they are | | | | the author left out "to boot," as: "Let's face it: |
| first presented in that part of the User Document. | | | | backups are boring and a hassle." We'll return to |
| You cannot define them only the first time they | | | | this example shortly. |
| appear in the User Document. This assumes -- | | | | Example: Functional Fixedness |
| incorrectly -- that Users read your User | | | | An object's function is fixed in a person's mind. |
| Document from start to finish. | | | | For example, a hammer's function is to pound |
| Problems Writers Cause When Assuming User | | | | things. Experiments have demonstrated that |
| Experience | | | | people have a hard time using a hammer for an |
| Our assumptions as writers can get us into | | | | unusual function, such as a paperweight, a prop, |
| trouble. | | | | or a lever. This is called functional fixedness. |
| Example: Unfamiliar Words | | | | Functional fixedness can limit the usefulness of |
| Here's a gardening example: Acme's (a fictitious | | | | your product. Your User Document should |
| company) Illustrated Guide to Gardening in Canada | | | | attempt to overcome functional fixedness. |
| (1979) makes an incorrect assumption about its | | | | Perhaps this example will show how critical I am |
| Readers: | | | | of User Documents. |
| In one of their definitions they use a term, "the | | | | I have a wrist global positioning satellite (GPS) |
| axil of a leaf" to define another term. "Axil of a | | | | device that keeps track of my long walks. |
| leaf" is not listed in the book's index, and there is | | | | Sweaters and heavy coats, needed for walking in |
| no glossary in the book. Clearly this book | | | | the winter, make it difficult to wear the GPS |
| assumes that the Reader understands the term | | | | device on the wrist. But it is a WRIST device. |
| "the axil of a leaf." I don't, and am therefore | | | | Functional fixedness arises, causing me struggle to |
| unhappy with the presentation. | | | | use the GPS on my wrist. But it turns out that |
| Solution: Provide a glossary of gardening terms or | | | | the GPS works well when used in a pocket. |
| a reference to a page in the book where the | | | | The GPS User Document should mention this |
| term is defined. | | | | (obvious?) capability, thus reducing the functional |
| Example: Assuming Students' Experience | | | | fixedness associated with the WRIST GPS. In my |
| Here is an example where an (unstated) | | | | defense: I am not sure that putting the wrist GPS |
| assumption by a training company rendered one | | | | in a pocket is more obvious than using a hammer |
| of their courses useless. | | | | as a paperweight. |
| In order to do the exercises in a computer | | | | Example: Humor |
| programming course, students had to be able to | | | | Humor relies on: |
| use an editor (a simple word processor) to | | | | . a subtle knowledge of the language (for example |
| program the system. The only editor available on | | | | a pun) |
| the course machines was a UNIX editor known as | | | | . or a knowledge of an event (perhaps a current |
| vi. | | | | event or entertainment event)on which the |
| Unfortunately, the students were not told that | | | | humor is based. Here's an example, from an old |
| they needed to use the vi editor. The course | | | | joke: |
| presenters assumed that the students knew vi. | | | | "You're so funny, you should be on a stage. |
| The students did not, and they spent half the | | | | There's one leaving in 15 minutes." |
| course time trying to learn and deal with vi. | | | | This joke relies on the Reader's knowing the two |
| The hidden assumption by the training company | | | | meanings of "stage": (1) a place for performing, |
| resulted in a failed learning experience (the | | | | and (2) transportation used in the western United |
| students never needed to use vi again). It wasted | | | | States in the 1800's. Most Readers might not |
| two days of the four-day course time. | | | | know the second meaning, rendering the humor a |
| Don't Present Assumptions in a Sneaky Way | | | | confusing waste of words. |
| If the training company had said that, "We train | | | | Earlier we examined the sentence: "Let's face it: |
| on UNIX systems," then they leave a way out | | | | backups are boring and a hassle to boot." The |
| for themselves when they disappoint students | | | | author used the phrase "to boot" as some form |
| who do not know the vi editor. When confronted, | | | | of folksy talk or humor. It confused the Reader. |
| the company could respond with, "We told you it | | | | Eliminate Humor from Your User Document |
| was a UNIX system. You should know that vi is | | | | . Humor will only confuse Users who do not |
| the editor available on that system." | | | | understand it. |
| This sneaky statement of the assumption is | | | | . Humor is difficult, if not impossible, to translate |
| foolish. It will result in a lose-lose situation. | | | | into other languages. |
| The Bottom Line | | | | I suggest that you use a writing style that is |
| As writers, we to make assumptions about our | | | | informal and conversational, but with no attempts |
| Reader's experience. However, if you make | | | | at humor. Remove attempts at humor when you |
| assumptions, then make sure that you tell the | | | | review and revise your writing. |
| Reader what you assume about him/her. | | | | If you want to write humor, do it elsewhere (you |
| Think about the assumptions that you make | | | | should be on a stage). User Documents are no |
| about your Reader. Are these assumptions valid | | | | place to practice your humor. |
| (that is, can you really expect your Readers to | | | | The Bottom Line |
| meet your assumptions)? If there is any doubt in | | | | Assumptions |
| your mind, include information explaining the terms | | | | Be careful about what you assume about your |
| and procedures that you assume. | | | | Reader. When in doubt whether or not a Reader |
| Make sure that when you state assumptions, that | | | | knows something: |
| you present them in a way that the Reader | | | | . State your assumptions about your Reader |
| (student) can understand what the assumption | | | | State the assumptions in a way that the Reader |
| means to them. Don't be sneaky about presenting | | | | can relate to |
| the assumptions. | | | | . When in doubt, add the information that you |
| User Experience Can Cause Trouble for Writers | | | | assume, or |
| Your Reader's experience can cause confusion. | | | | . Tell your Reader where to find the assumed |
| Here are some examples: | | | | information |
| Example: Shampoo/Conditioner Product | | | | By providing or pointing to this assumed |
| One of my favorite examples is a combined hair | | | | information, you increase your audience |
| shampoo and conditioner product. If a User has | | | | Readers' Experience |
| experience with the separate products, then their | | | | Be aware of how your Reader's experience |
| experience is to: | | | | influences how he/she interprets your User |
| * Shampoo: Wet thenhair. Massage shampoo into | | | | Document or uses your product. If necessary add |
| the hair, then rinse it out. | | | | material to your User Document to counter your |
| * Conditioner: Wash the hair. Massage conditioner | | | | Reader's incompatible experience. |