Economies Of Scale Vs. Economies Of Scope

ally speaking, economies of scale is about theAng and Lin (2001) bring a case study from the
benefits gained by the production of large volumefinancial industry, and the ways economies of
of a product, while economies of scope is linkedscope and economies of scale work for mutual
to benefits gained by producing a wide variety offund offerings. At Fidelity, an example of
products by efficiently utilising the sameeconomies of scope at work, investors had the
Operations. Each of these business strategies,option for high diversified portfolio at the same
their strengths and weaknesses, will be discussedinstitution. But aiming at cost reduction (which is of
in details in this paper.interest to clients and investors), the economies
“Economies of scale” has beenof scope did not provide the desired objectives,
known for long time as a major factor inwhile economies of scale did, in the case of
increasing profitability and contributing to amutual funds. Trying to find the ideal conditions
firm’s other financial and operational ratios.for economies of scale and economies of scope,
Mass production of a mature, standardisedthe authors say that a single-product firm should
product can apply the most efficient line-flowpursue the economies of scale. However,
process and standard inputs for reducing theeconomies of scope for a two-product firm is
manufacturing cost (per unit). Mass manufacturingsaid to exist “if the cost of producing the
is also associated with a significant market-share,two products jointly is less than producing the
and a tight supply-chain management (up tosame products separately”. When it
vertical integration with suppliers and retailers). Tocomes to three or more products, the number of
maintain the market-share, the market leaderproduction combinations increases, so evaluation
should come with continuous productof the economies of scope becomes more
improvements, so to sustain demand and avoidcomplicated and requires more data to analyse.
its dropping, following the product’sAdvocating for a different view of the economies
maturity in the Product Life-Cycle (PLC).of scope and scale, Peppers and Rogers (1995)
“Economies of scope” is relativelyput the customers under the spotlight. They
a new approach to business strategy, and isargue that market share can be seen as share of
heavily based on the development of highcustomer, pursuing customer differentiation rather
technology. Economies of scope, as defined bythan product differentiation, managing customers
using same processes for producing similarand not only products and more emphasis on
products, can fit the batch-flow oreconomies of scope at the expense of scale.
group-technology processes; nevertheless, forAs expected, between these two approaches
best results the flexible-manufacturing should bethere is a “grey area”, in which
adopted. Computer Integrated Manufacturingfirms found a way to enjoy both worlds of
(CIM) allows lowering the setup-time and requiredeconomies of scale and scope.
tuning between products, so to be economicallyMass-customisation, I believe, provides few similar
efficient for small batches of non-standardisedcustomised products (the concept behind
products. In other words, companies can competeeconomies of scope) along with operating
on product customisation and short lead-time.mass-production and controlling large
A case study at GM shows that new competitionmarket-share for each of these products.
can reduce firm’s market share and itsREFERENCES
benefits from economies of scale (Howell, 2003).Ang, J.S. & Lin, J.W. (2001, May). A
The author argues that the main problem wasfundamental approach to estimating economies of
the neglect of innovation, as a side-effect ofscale and scope of financial products: The case of
GM’s strategy (until the Japanese carsmutual funds. Review of Quantitative Finance and
entered the US market, in the late 1970s). CachonAccounting, 16(3), 205-221.
and Harker (2002) found that scale economies areCachon, G.P. & Harker, P.T. (2002, October).
so powerful that to provide a strong motivationCompetition and outsourcing with scale economies.
for outsourcing, too; even though the outsourcingManagement Science, 48(10), 1314-1333.
contractors are not allowed reaching the sameDobson, G., & Yano, C. A. (2002, Fall).
scale as the outsourcer. Dobson andProduct offering, pricing, and make-to-stock
Yano’s (2002) article is an in-dept scholarlymake-to-order decisions with shared capacity.
analysis of the factors associated with economiesProduction and Operations Management, 11(3),
(and diseconomies) of scale and economies (and293-312.
diseconomies) of scope. The authors argue thatHowell, H.J. (2003, May/June). Adapting GM
mass-customisation, which means broader productresearch to a new corporate strategy. Research
lines, “may help to increase market shareTechnology Management, 46(3), 14-20.
and may allow higher prices to be charged, butPeppers, D., & Rogers, M. (1995). A new
they also cause challenges associated withmarketing paradigm: Share of customer, not
diseconomies of scope” such as setupmarket share. Managing Service Quality, 5(3),
time.48-51.